My (Rachel, a future staving linguist and/or journalist) personal blog and part-time unofficial Peter Sarsgaard fansite. This is a blog about, really, a ton of random ramblings of mine. This blog's posts usually cover "a... unique topic" according to one reader.. Maybe it's more of an online journal of mine. Sometimes I write about music, movies, and tv, in addition to whatever else comes to mind that I deem worthy to write about. Have fun (hopefully) reading it!
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
Observation
In other matters, a more positive and pleasing observation. Just earlier, I had to deliver something to be delivered to someone. It was at the local high school which I graduated from last year. So I went into the main office and there was a woman there who presumably was the secretary. There was also the school police officer whose car I saw parked out front as I was entering. I talked to the secretary lady who basically referred me to the police officer and he wrote something down. I did not know that he served as an assistant secretary, but apparently at least today that's what he was doing. And on to the prime observation here. As he wrote, I noticed that he was left handed. I had seen and even talked with him occasionally in the past when I was a student there, but I had never seen him writing anything. In addition, he wrote in all capitals which is a thing that some other men I have known do. Apparently, it supposedly means that the person is trying to hide/obscure something (about their personality, which supposedly can be revealed by handwriting). Which happened to bring to mind a particular teacher that I had had who is also left handed and writes in all capitals. In any case, this of course goes back to the one and only character of Goren from Law and Order. As I would hope people would be aware, I think he is a very interesting character and all that. He (meaning Vincent who played said character) is also left handed although I don't think there are any really decent samples of his handwriting on the show. I wonder what it looks like. I think I'll conclude this post here, because from this point I would just be going on about how law enforcement and crime stuff is interesting to me, which is something I've certainly been over in the past, I believe.
As an aside, there are no interesting movies on Netflix that I feel like watching which is a shame and they apparently removed Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind which I had wanted to watch but didn't get a chance to before it was gone. Alas.
Monday, January 23, 2017
Critiquing SNL
This post isn't exactly the most serious of things, but regardless.. I happened to be watching videos on YouTube and one came up in the recommendations that was a skit from a recent SNL. In general, I don't watch SNL but sometimes the skits that make it onto YouTube happen to be rather amusing. Although lots of other times the show is just kind of downright weird. I think you have to be very aware of all the pop culture related news that happened that week in order to completely get a full episode of SNL.
In any case, this particular skit was about a guy who disliked a movie that many people enjoyed, so he gets attacked for that in the form of getting arrested and interrogated. By some officers (as they are called by a character in the skit), or rather probably detectives as these characters semi resembled the characters of Elliot Stabler and Olivia Benson from the long running show Law and Order SVU. Semi resembled in that their style of dress was reminiscent of Elliot and Olivia respectively (although not Elliot’s hairstyle, or rather, lack of hair; however the female character in the skit had a hairstyle reminiscent of, say, season 4 (this is off the top of my head, I may be wrong) Olivia) in that the guy had rolled up sleeves and the woman was wearing the kind of jacket that Olivia has worn on the show. However, the personalities of the skit characters were a little off - the guy did do some of the intimidating that Elliot has done but in other occasions in the skit, the guy acted too mellow while the woman was shoutier than Olivia tends to be. The skit also happened to include a part where the female character throws a chair through/at the mirrored glass which then breaks, which was sort of amusing in that I know a similar thing happened in a CI episode although in this skit again, it was a little off. In the Law and Order episode, it was the criminal who did the glass breaking although it wasn't with a chair, he smashed it with his fists and the final scene was of the detectives seen through the shattered glass. I think maybe something like that has happened in SVU but I don't remember the specifics.
Anyways, that was my pointless little critique of a recent SNL skit. I suppose it's not that surprising coming from a Law and Order fiend like myself.
Monday, January 16, 2017
Sctl pltcl rmrks
Try to guess what the title is supposed to say!
Eyelashes guy was on CNN tonight and he said things. He commentated. Basically, the gist of what he said when I was paying attention was that people need to get over the possibility of Russian interference in the election and that the country needs more unity. He also said that two wrongs don't make a right, regarding how people disrespected Obama when he was elected and how similar things are sort of happening now. Which... I don't particularly agree with, but these opinions aren't horribly abhorrent. There's some solace there. While ideally becoming more united would be a good thing, Donald Trump is not a normal politician, so I don't think we can necessarily acquiesce and become complacent (I'm not sure those words are the most accurate to express my sentiments, but I wanted to use some big fancy words).
In other matters, sort of, I have decided to begin watching a commentary by Noam Chomsky called Requiem for the American Dream. Partly because of the title but also partly because of Noam Chomsky being a famous linguist. This is sort of related to the whole Donald Trump mess in that it's apparently about how wealth has become concentrated in a very small amount of people. I will write a review when I finish watching it.
Sunday, January 15, 2017
Sexiest men alive
- George Clooney (twice!),
- Johnny Depp (twice)
- Brad Pitt (also twice)
- Chris Hemsworth
- Adam Levine
- Dwayne Johnson (most recently)
- Mark Harmon (of NCIS fame which apparently [apparently meaning to my recollection of what I've read in passing around the internets about this show] is quite popular with middle aged women. I guess he is to NCIS as Patrick Dempsey is to Grey's Anatomy).
- Tom Cruise (back in 1990! I wonder if he was better looking then than he is now. I guess there's not a huge difference, unlike some other people who I could mention.)
- Harrison Ford
- Bradley Cooper
- Hugh Jackman (there are a number of actors named Hugh - Hugh Laurie [House MD], Hugh Dancy [Hannibal] as well as this Hugh)
- Ben Affleck
- David Beckham
- Matt Damon
Saturday, January 14, 2017
More theoreticality
Recently, I happened to look through the photos of JW Anderson's most recent fashion show, FW17. This show had many looks which incorporated crochet, which I thought was interesting because I learned to crochet a few months ago. In addition to the crochet-wear, another thing that caught my attention (unsurprisingly) was one of the models in this show - he was quite eye catching! Probably the thing that caught my eye was that he was very blonde like another person who was the subject of a recent post. So, naturally, I had to try and find out the name of this model and after a bit of searching around, I did, and I was quite pleased with myself. Apparently he is German. Also apparently he is a rather new model so he hasn't done very much modeling work so far. I hope that he does more modeling work in the future so that there will be more pictures of him that I can look at because more good looking people to look at never killed anybody, and I'm certainly probably not going to find good looking people to look at on the online dating website. In any case, it makes me wistful over that particular good looking person who was the subject of a recent post and who is also very blonde and could be a model because of his appearance. I wonder if he has German ethnicity, or Swedish, or Danish or Norwegian. Perhaps eastern European. I have no idea. His name is not obviously (or subtly) Scandinavian/German like the name "Mikkelsen" (Danish, as in the actor Mads Mikkelsen) or "Müller" (German, as in the Fußballspieler für Bayern München Thomas Müller) or "Skarsgaard" (Swedish, as in the actor Alexander Skarsgaard) or even "Wilberg" (as in... it goes without saying). I would have mentioned Italian names or perhaps French-esque names but stereotypically Scandinavians and Germans are supposed to be blonde so I went with that. In any case, I know barely anything about him, much less which particular European country his ancestors were from. Although there are some other people who I do know the details of their ethnicity, that's not the subject at hand.
To the subject of taking initiative, on one hand it would be a good (or perhaps not terribly horrible) thing to do, but on the other hand, why not just let people live their lives and not go intruding and expecting to be given an answer/attention and so on and so forth. Plus, he could possibly be gay, in which case I'd feel very foolish. So, perhaps the opening line could be "Before I go any father, are you gay?" Getting the important things out of the way first... In one way, that would be a good thing to say because then I would have my answer to that but on the other hand it would also be a weird thing to ask right off the bat and therefore probably I should avoid saying that. Basically, the best solution is to just not say anything because I have no idea where to start in a way that would feel genuine to me and also not be terribly off puttingly WEIRD. I don't know if people starting out conversations like that has ever been successful. I wonder how I would react if someone asked me "Before I go any farther, are you a lesbian?" I would probably say no, I guess. (the uncertainty here is not about being a lesbian, but rather about how best to react to a question like that. Another possible reaction could be "Why (insert optional profanity here) are you asking me that?!" or if it were asked by that horrible thing, merely a "FUCK OFF!!!") In any case, if I ever come up with some normal conversation ideas as well as some initiative, I will let you all know how that goes. Ideally it would go well and I would not make an impression of "she is really weird and I don't think I want to be around someone like that." I'm not sure if maybe I already blew it with the hair touching event. It is very possible that I did. I wonder if he remembers that. I don't think I'd mind too much if he does indeed remember that, but I would mind if it caused his impression of me to be "she is really weird and I don't think I want to be around someone like that." In which case, refer to my previous post where I mentioned an apology about the hair touching event.
I have touched
the hair
that was on
your head
and which
you probably
thought
was WEIRD
Forgive me
It was soft
So blonde
and so dazzling.
(If my former apology isn't good enough, here is another one in a more poetic form. This particular poem structure lends itself perfectly to this purpose. Me writing poems like this actually goes back all the way to the 8th grade when we had an assignment to do such, and the concept caught on and I began to write many, many more. Incidentally, it was also back in middle school when I noticed (although I didn't take particular note of) the very blonde hair and it was eye catching back then too.)
I also have to wonder how much on the scale of weirdness that that poem would be for something to tell him. I feel like it could definitely be pretty far up there. Perhaps somewhat less weird than the previous theoretical open letter, just since it's shorter, but still probably pretty weird. It would be somewhat more relevant though than something like "What do you think about the topic of drug addicts/addiction?" which is something that could possibly lead to an interesting conversation, but on the other hand is also an incredibly odd thing to tell someone who you barely know anything about as a conversation starter. "Hello. I think you are good looking so please talk to me." That one is worse in some ways, one way being that it does come across as rather desperate but on the other hand, is quite blunt about my intentions which is a quality that I value.
As an aside, I think "More good looking people to look at never killed anybody" should be another one of my quotes, along with "Nobody plans on becoming a drug addict" and "You have nice teeth" and "I only like him because of his eyelashes" and "Full Metal Jacket was a strange movie but it did stick with me, apparently." I think these are some quotes that nicely sum up myself. (I put them in chronological order to the best of my memory of when I first came up with them) Also, an honorable mention to a quote that isn't mine but is one that I like: "Maybe in a few years I'll be a more uplifting person." Guess/Remember who said that? (it is the same person who was the subject of the "You have nice teeth" quote. He said that quote probably about 10 years ago because I remember reading it in an interview that was done regarding the album All the Stars and Boulevards, which is from 2005.)
Thursday, January 12, 2017
Album review: Turn on the Bright Lights
I know technically you're supposed to do reviews of things (movies, music, tv, etc) that have recently been released but I just do them based on what's new and/or interesting to me in terms of things that I've watched/read/listened to regardless of if I'm 15 years late such as for this review of an album released in 2002 when I was only a small child.
Now, onto the main topic here. In the sort of recent past, the Killers covered a song called Obstacle 1 by the band Interpol. I listened to this cover and thought Flowers did a good job of it and that the song was interesting. So I ended up listening to the original version of the song which Flowers did quite a good job of mirroring. Generally, covers shouldn't stray too far from the original song. Usually I find myself more amicable towards covers of other songs by bands that I already like rather than covers by other people of songs by bands that I like. Hence, I enjoy the Killers covering Obstacle 1 and Muse covering Please Please Please (which is far superior to the original version in my opinion), but I can't be certain that I'd enjoy, say, some other band/singer covering Mr. Brightside or something. Hopefully you get the idea. In any case, in addition to listening to Interpol's Obstacle 1, I branched out a little bit into another song from the same album (Turn on the Bright Lights - 2002) called NYC. It's an interesting song to say the least. Rather mellow and morose at the same time. Obstacle 1 is a bit more upbeat but at the same time it is also morose. Eventually I listened to the album in its entirety - 11 songs. Overall, it's a morose album. I consider it morose as opposed to melancholy which is a word I use to describe All the Stars and Boulevards by Augustana (plus some of their other songs could be described as such) along with thoughtful which describes all of their songs. Having looked up the definitions of morose and melancholy, the latter means something along the lines of a thoughtful sadness which I think makes pretty good sense to describe All the Stars and Boulevards. Morose means gloomy which is a fair enough description of Turn on the Bright Lights. (huh, both of those album titles are sort of long and wordy)
Overall, the lyrics of the songs on Turn on the Bright Lights range from slightly weird to very weird. Which in some cases works/isn't a particular detriment to the songs but in other cases I don't think it really helps. I think perhaps the lyrics are just a little too weird for me to enjoy the album in full although I do like a few of the songs off of it. Perhaps it's like the people who like Mr. Brightside and Somebody Told Me and All These Things That I've Done off of the Killers' album Hot Fuss but don't particularly care for the rest of the album for whatever reason.
So, in conclusion, I'm not completely sold on this album and it didn't jump out at me like "wow, what a great album!!" although again there are a few songs off of it that I like. It's possible that (this is a sentence that would require the subjunctive in Spanish, by the way) this album might grow on me if I listened to it more, but I'm not sure if I particularly want to listen to it in full again. I suppose I like this band ever so slightly more than the Strokes, who I tried to get into but just couldn't find any songs of theirs that I particularly liked even after going through like the first 5 that popped up in search results so which I assume are the most popular. I would've thought that I would have found at least one song in that selection that I at least sort of liked but alas, I didn't. However, Instant Crush (which isn't really a Strokes song though) is a good song. I guess I like (?!?!) the Smashing Pumpkins ever so slightly more than the Strokes because there are about 5 songs of theirs that I know, and I don't know any Strokes songs. Even though I don't particularly like the Smashing Pumpkins, I know a few of their songs and occasionally for reasons unknown (see what I did there?) feel compelled to listen to them - these songs comprising of 1979, Bullet with Butterfly Wings, Disarm, and Today. Perhaps I could throw Ava Adore on this list as well. But that's it. And I don't even like those songs, I just occasionally for some reason feel compelled to listen to them. A trivia is that the intro to the Smashing Pumpkins' song Today is rather similar to My Chemical Romance's song I Don't Love You. I think MCR was somewhat influenced by the Smashing Pumpkins. However, Gerard seems like a nice person but Billy Corgan just doesn't and I think this is part of why I don't like the Smashing Pumpkins. By this point this post has gotten rather off track from the main subject of Interpol to then the Strokes to then the Smashing Pumpkins with an allusion to the Killers thrown in and then to MCR. So this here will be the end of this long winded post.
Wednesday, January 11, 2017
Poetry
the commentator
that was on
CNN
you probably
don't
care about
But those eyelashes
So long
and so magnificent
I am just fascinated
by those eyelashes
When on CNN you speak
It is your eyelashes I desire to see
Although your opinions I critique
And your eyeballs rather blue
By others much money has been spent
To have eyelashes like you
Was to research your political affiliation