*sigh*

I was having dinner tonight and I was trying not to look too weird because of my recent infatuation (which is really the only fitting way describe it) with Peter Sarsgaard. What I mean by "trying not to look too weird" is that he's a large part of what I've been thinking about (I don't want to say "all I can think about", because I am thinking of some other things as well, believe it or not) these past few days or so. What comes with this is some funky facial expressions on my part (they're supposed to express happiness/satisfaction about having found someone whose appearance I would like to look at, and also whose voice I would like to hear say things), and contented sighing. Cheesy, I know. So hence, "trying not to look too weird" about it all since I was around my family members and I don't need them asking about this. I'd rather keep it to myself. I think/hope maybe in a few days I'll be able to cool it a little bit regarding this. It's enjoyable and all, but I also feel like I'm just absolutely going crazy over him (in a mostly good, harmless way, but still). I'm pretty sure I was more or less like this back when I was getting into Law and Order and Vincent's performance as Detective Goren. Also eyelashes guy on CNN. So this is far from unprecedented.  

So then the thought came to me that at least he's a decent person and he's not super weird looking like, say, Marilyn Manson, and he's also not a despicable person like Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Bill O'Reilly, Mike Pence, Adolf Hitler, etc. In that light, it seems quite acceptable/reasonable to be like this about him. Better him than one of those other people I just listed. I'm just waiting till I have a strange dream starring him. I wonder what that'll be like. I certainly have been thinking about him enough that I could see it happening for him to show up in a dream. (Edit: as of June 12, I have not dreamed about him yet that I remember, but I did dream last night about Jared Leto...)

Which then led me to wonder if there are people out there that find the men I've listed under despicable persons to be attractive. I feel like it's definitely possible but it's also a freaky idea to think about. Let's say there are two different subsets: finding them physically attractive but not liking them as people, and finding them physically attractive while liking them as people as well. Both subsets are still a strange idea to fathom, but I can somewhat understand the first one slightly. The second one... yikes. 

Anyways, I would like to see what people have to say about this, so I googled "Donald Trump is attractive"... my comments on what I've found coming up! Firstly though I would like to hypothesize that it's more likely that Trump supporters would find Donald Trump to be physically attractive. Also as you can see this post fits in nicely with my recent shallowness related posts. 

Exhibit 1: here is a Slate article from February of last year (unintentional reference) so it's sort of outdated, but I still think there could be some interesting information contained within. One of the quotes so far: "whatever Trump's appeal, it's not of a sexual variety"
And: Melania "has declared him the 'sexiest man in the world,'" which is frightening to think about. 
So far, this article seems to be about what I was looking for. It quotes an evolutionary psychologist who says that the notable physical characteristics of Donald Trump are not objectively/scientifically attractive, and that it's more likely that women are attracted to his status and prestige. So basically because he's rich, they're attracted to him. But money can't buy good looks (at least past a certain extent/amount of plastic surgery). 
In 1976 an article about Donald Trump described him as "tall, lean and blond." You can be tall, lean and blonde but still be ugly. Although he probably did look ever so slightly less bad back then. But not good looking by any means in my opinion. 

Exhibit 2: Now an article from Vice, published in March 2016, so still not super current either. It has some interviews with a number of people who find Donald Trump to be attractive. It opens with saying that "Donald Trump is an enigma, wrapped in a riddle, wrapped in cash" which is a fair enough description. 

One of the women interviewed for this article said: "I like tall men with broad shoulders." Okay, fine, but there are a ton of tall men with broad shoulders who aren't Donald Trump. "I want to feel protected with a man. Donald comes off as physically imposing, but approachable in his interviews." More like appalling... 
"I also really love his teeth, even if they are veneers." ... Interesting that she mentioned teeth, but it's Donald Trump we're talking about, and his teeth are fake, and he's Donald Trump. I like someone who has nice real teeth (guess who!) and is also a decent person, as opposed to Donald Trump.
She says that his "success and ability to project confidence" is more important than his fame and money... uh, okay. I guess what I see as being completely oblivious, this lady takes as projecting confidence... 
Then she concludes that Donald Trump suffers from rosacea and that's why he has the fake tan. I'm really curious as to how she came to that conclusion about the rosacea. And about his hair: "I don't really have any problem with the hair. I actually kind of like it." No comment.
She says that she "understands" that Donald Trump is nicer when he's not on camera. I find that somewhat hard to believe. She says that even if he weren't rich, she would think that he's hot. Again, I have no words. 

Another woman who was interviewed: "He's really cute, with his little boy face." This is just... a strange comment all around. This lady also says "I think he looks great. He's 6'3", with his wide shoulders, beautiful skin, those blue eyes. It's all there. And he walks like a man walks!" WTF is all that I can say here. Especially about the "beautiful skin" part. "He knows what he wants and how to get it, and that's alluring." Okay, I sort of understand that, I guess. Although if we look at how he's been doing as president, I don't think he's quite as good at getting what he wants as one might think. 

In this article, there was a link to another article where someone photoshopped Donald Trump to try and make him look better. The result is... freaky. I would say it looks like Liev Schreiber a little bit, but that's probably doing a disservice to Liev Schreiber. 

Anyways, speaking of Donald Trump appearance related things, I saw a police officer today whose hair reminded me of Donald Jr and/or Eric Trump. I wonder if the police officer got a hairstyle like that on purpose to resemble the Trump sons. If so, yikes. Although it's possible that maybe he didn't and it's just an unfortunate coincidence. This guy also had a sleeve tattoo, which I wasn't aware was allowed for the local police officers. But apparently it is. In terms of police officers I've seen, he wasn't exactly appealing due to the haircut and the sleeve tattoo. Sorry, random police officer guy. 

I thought that looking this up was... sort of enlightening/insightful, but in an unpleasant way. The fact that some people find him attractive... eek! And I'm totally just going crazy over Peter Sarsgaard at the moment. I really, really am. 

Edit: Today I watched MSNBC for a change and there was a little segment on how Melania is finally moving to the White House. Which got me wondering how on earth she can be (or at least, was in the past, since currently their relationship seems like it might be kind of frosty) attracted to him. Yikes! (again) 

Actors, again

(or, "A shallowfest")
So apparently I am on a shallowness kick and therefore I wanted to know about what other people (women) think about various actors; namely, who their favorites are and all that. I thought of a good place where I might be able to find such information (after considering asking random women at the grocery store, I came upon a simpler method) for my reading pleasure - Reddit. r/askwomen specifically. 

What follows will be my commentary (based on looking at the first results in google images for the ones whose appearances I'm not familiar with) about the actors that I see mentioned in the things that came up. Fun, eh? ** For the best experience reading this post, I recommend that you have a google images tab at the ready so you too can look up the names of the actors whose appearances you're not familiar with. **

• Tom Hardy: Meh. Very facially hairy it seems - not my type. Kind of looks similar to David Beckham, I think. Maybe a bit like Channing Tatum as well.
• Michael Fassbender: Better than Tom Hardy. Decent. Probably on a George Clooney level for me in terms of looks minus my aversion to George Clooney for reasons I've mentioned before. He looks a little like the actor who plays Owen Hunt on Grey's Anatomy (I want to know what happens!! I can't wait until fall.. !!) 
• Sebastian Stan: I'm kind of familiar with him in that I know what he looks like. I think he looks kind of like Misha Collins. Also decent looking, I'd say, but not on the level of my personal favorite actors. Maybe if I watched some things with these various actors in them I might begin to like their appearances more. Who knows! 
• Jamie Dornan: He's the guy from 50 Shades of Grey. I sort of know what he looks like. I guess he didn't particularly stun me or I'd have a stronger (positive) opinion on him. Also decent, I guess. 
• Chris Evans: Looks kind of like Tom Hardy. So what I said about him applies here too.
• Henry Cavill: Looks like Matt Bomer and/or Ian Somerhalder. Dark hair and light eyes is a nice combination, usually. I'd say he's on the higher end of decent.
• Someone mentioned Colin Farrell, who I coincidentally covered in a previous post. Meh.
• Alexander Skarsgaard: he's Swedish, so that's fun. Not super familiar with his appearance though. On a search, he ever so somewhat slightly reminds me of Jesse Spencer, an Australian actor who had a role in House MD.
• Andy Whitfield: some how I've heard of him. Looked him up. Meh. His face is too square, or something, for me. (Apparently he's dead and has been for 6 years, fyi)
• Aidan Turner: He's Irish. He kind of reminds me of a mix between Russell Brand and Ezra Miller, but the result is somewhat more visually appealing than I find either of those actors. Decent. He has similar coloring to Cillian Murphy or Colin Morgan, I think.
• Tom Hiddleston: I kind of forgot about him, but I think he's good looking.
• Ewan McGregor: Hmm.. not bad, but not stunning either. Decent, I guess. He somewhat looks like a lighter haired version of Tom Cruise, a little bit.
• Oscar Isaac: He looks very Mediterranean/Hispanic. Decent, I guess, but not really my type. Not delicate enough for me, I guess.
• The guy from that show I was watching (who played the detective with a southern accent): He played an interesting character, but I'm not exactly sure I'd say he was highly attractive looking. Maybe if he shaved off the facial hair. 
• Ezra Miller: like I've mentioned in the past, I think his eyes are too far up on his head/his cheeks are too long. Though someone commented "He's just so pretty" which is what I'm currently thinking not about Ezra Miller, but about Peter Sarsgaard. 
• Chris Hemsworth: points for being Australian, I'd say, but not really my type. He's not ugly, though.
• (surprised I haven't seen George Clooney yet! My mother thinks George Clooney is good looking) 
• James (not D'Arcy) McAvoy: he kind of looks like a weirder version of Peter Sarsgaard, if anyone else sees that... He's decent looking. Nothing to write home blog posts about though. (well, I might write a blog post about him but only in relation to how I think he looks like a weirder version of Peter Sarsgaard)
• Kit Harington: Lotta hair on that guy. Not my type (although it's not necessarily because of the hair).
• I've also not yet seen Leo mentioned, which surprises me a little bit. 
• Jared Leto: I've written about him before. He looked decent in Requiem for a Dream but I don't think I'm really a fan of him outside of that.
• Mads Mikkelsen: Kind of surprised to see him mentioned, for some reason. He's quite interesting looking and has a cool European/Danish accent. 
• Ryan Reynolds: looks kind of like Adam Levine, a little. I think his eyes are a little too close together though and his face is kind of long.
• Ryan Gosling: see above, although he looks less like Adam Levine, probably because he has lighter hair.
• Bradley Cooper: I kind of forgot what he looked like but he's actually kind of interesting looking. Nice blue irises. Sort of Patrick Dempsey-esque. He's good-looking but I don't have a particular affinity for him.
• Also wondering if I'll see anyone mention Patrick Dempsey. My mother likes his appearance too. He is from Maine.
• Adrien Brody: ... he's kind of freaky looking.
• Ronan Farrow (he's actually a journalist - he's really young: 29!): not bad, decent but a little generic looking for my tastes, I think.
• Brad Pitt: interesting to see him show up. I think he's a perfectly decent actor, but I don't have a particular affinity for his appearance. According to something I read in a celebrity gossip magazine last night at the grocery store, he's an alcoholic which is what contributed to the demise of his marriage.
• Josh Duhamel: Like a mix of... Matt Damon and Tom Cruise, I think. Something thereabouts. 
• Finally someone mentioned Leo(nardo DiCaprio)! I think he's good looking (in some cases, at least) and he's a good actor as well. 
• David Tennant: Doctor Who! I can understand that. He has an interesting Scottish accent (although he didn't use it when he played the Doctor).
• Charlie Hunnam: he looks like he would be a hockey player. Speaking of which, I looked up Alex Ovechkin who is an actual hockey player and the only one I know by name. He plays for the local hockey team and he's Russian.
• Ian Somerhalder: I've never watched the show that he was (is still?) on but from what I've seen of him he's decently good looking. Kind of like Patrick Dempsey, but younger.
• Jesse Spencer: "as Dr. Chase in House. That accent. I think that's one of the main reasons I watched that show, and why I stopped after he was no longer a regular."
• Norman Reedus: I know that he's on a zombie show but I don't think he's good looking. He's weird looking. 
• Robert Sean Leonard: he's nice looking and his character was a pleasure to see on House MD. "He's insanely hot in Dead Poets Society and the boyish charm thing in House just gets me bonkers."
• Grant Gustin: ... aka, The Flesh Flash (ugh). Not bad looking, but very generic looking. Very much so.
• Chris Meloni: (Elliot from SVU - do I need to say more?) 
• Jason Bateman: I can only see him as Michael from Arrested Development. He's a good kind of average looking.
• Hugh Dancy: Decent. And if I put myself to it I could probably watch the entirety of NBC's Hannibal, which he was in along with Mads Mikkelsen as Hannibal.
• Jake Gyllenhaal: Meh. Not really my type.
• Jason Momoa: Eek. Definitely not my type.
• WOw!! Someone mentioned James D'Arcy! That surprised me because I don't think he's particularly well known. But he is very good looking. 
• Colin Morgan: he reminds me of Ben Whishaw in terms of physique.
• Andrew Garfield: is to Ben Whishaw as Mark Ruffalo is to Vincent D'Onofrio, in terms of looking similar-ish and my preference between them.
• Matt Damon: for some reason I see his as being similar to Tom Hanks. Probably something about how they have very 'American' looks/essences to them, if that makes sense.
• Jason Statham: If Matt Damon didn't play Jason Bourne, this guy looks like he'd fit that role well. I found this weird article while searching him...
• Hugo Weaving: he's... interesting looking. And looks like a mix of some people I can't quite figure out.
• James Franco: looks like a mix of Joseph Gordon Levitt and someone with fluffy hair. Pick your someone.
• Joe Manganiello: too muscly and stuff for me. Definitely not my type.
• Michael Cera: .... 

Still no mention of Patrick Dempsey, which surprised me a bit. A number of mentions of Alexander Skarsgaard but none of Peter Sarsgaard (no relation) which doesn't surprise me really because he's not that well known.  

Now, on to actors from a post that asks which ones women just don't get everyone's obsession with. I assume there might be some overlap with the ones I've already commented on.

• Ryan Gosling: Fair enough.
• Ryan Gosling again, plus Ryan Reynolds (see previous comment)
• Channing Tatum: Fair enough. He's "too muscly" and according to one person, "looks like a girly version of my brother," which is... interesting/amusing.
• Matthew McConaughey: there's someone new. He looks kind of like.. a pointier version of Patrick Dempsey.. not really my type, but not horrible looking. Meh.
• Christian Bale: Looks kind of like the previous guy. Eh.
• George Clooney: Interesting. I think he's good looking so I do get why people would also think that. I don't need to mention what I also think about him as a person.
• Brad Pitt: He is actually a decent actor, I'd say, even if I'm not fawning over his face/voice/other aspects.
• Jude Law: he definitely looks odd in some pictures.
• Joseph Gordon-Levitt: eyes are too close together and he looks like he's smirking in a lot of pictures which may or may not be intentional but regardless isn't a particularly good look. 

That's the end of that thread! Onto a new one. I think there was one about unconventional looking actors so I'll try to see what people have to say there.

• Hugh Grant: he is kinda old and looks like a mix of Seth Meyers, Bill Clinton and Ben Stiller.
• Liev Schrieber: he looks like Jude Law, a little bit??
• Vladimir Putin: !!!! (comment was from a year ago, though, so the context was maybe a little bit different)
• Cillian Murphy: definitely unconventional looking, but in a good way.
• Julian Assange: well, that's different...
• Jerry Orbach: Law and Order *dun dun* 
• Vincent (first name basis!): (also Law and Order [CI], for that matter)"Vincent D'Onofrio was a big one for me for many years until he creeped me out in an interview he did. I think it's that he's tall and kinda evil looking, I guess?" I definitely don't see Vincent as being evil looking. He's a dear. 
• Colin Firth: I don't think he's that unconventional looking?? He's nice looking either way.
• David Bowie: ... definitely weird looking and the only time he looks decent (even good looking, actually) is in some movie he was in, The Man Who Fell to Earth. I have no idea why he looks good there but everything else he looks weird in.
• Mark Ruffalo: not too unconventional, but I guess maybe it's because he's not as well known as some actors.
• Anderson Cooper: Anderson! I've liked him for years (although he's a journalist and not an actor). If I end up becoming a journalist myself, it's because of him, definitely. 
• Mads Mikkelsen: "Stupid sexy cannibal. I've sat through dozens of Danish, German, and Icelandic films to see his weird yet oddly attractive face." 
• Johnny Depp: "I just don't find him attractive until he's a drunken pirate." 
• Robert Downey Jr.: I don't really like the way he looks. He looks kind of like a rodent of some sort. 
• Tom Cruise (in Interview with the Vampire): !!!! Remember I did a post about this??? 

And with that, I feel like I've pretty much covered it all... whoa. What a ride. What fun! This post is so, so long. I can entertain myself pretty well, which is basically what this post is a form of. And I was kinda trying to distract myself from a certain topic. 

Also, here is a smattering of other interesting posts that I came across while perusing r/askwomen: 

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/4wxeei/how_often_do_you_see_people_who_are_reasonably/ 

One that asked "Do you think a world where every man fit your ideal of 'attractive' would be a better place?" a) I would become a polygamist. A very poly polygamist. b) they could still be awful as people, but at least they'd be easy on the eyes. I'd probably not get anything done, ever. I'd just want to look at them.

Movie review: Shattered Glass

I am on a roll! Next on the list of Peter Sarsgaard movies, since it seemed the most appealing/interesting, was Shattered Glass. It has to do with journalism, which seemed more interesting than say, mobsters. And I think he had a bigger role in this movie than in the mobster movie. 

It took place at a magazine in Washington DC, and in the beginning of the movie there were some exterior establishing shots of DC which I thought were interesting because it's interesting to see places you've been in movies. I'm not sure if the magazine still exists. I had never known before about the events that this movie was based off of, so it was kind of enlightening on that front. I just did some googling and apparently it does still exist. I guess it's not as well known as Time or Newsweek, etc. I wonder if I can find it in the magazine section at the grocery store. 

I enjoyed (unsurprisingly) Peter's performance in this movie. It was a good performance and the subject matter (journalism) was also one of particular interest to me. He was measured but intense in this movie. It was nice. No strange accents or facial hair either. He played the editor of the magazine the movie takes place at. The movie had an interesting tension to it, I thought. The lesson to take from it/the events depicted in it is that you shouldn't make things up if you're a journalist. Hmm. That reminds me of how Brian Williams, who used to do the Nightly News on NBC but has now been replaced, made some things up about when he covered the war in the middle east. That happened a couple of years ago and he got replaced by Lester Holt. Although recently it seems like he's managed to claw his way back from that scandal, since he now is on MSNBC and I've seen his picture in magazine advertisements for MSNBC. I was kind of surprised that NBC didn't just write him off completely and not let him have any kind of new job like he does now. I wonder if he misses doing the nightly news. It's kind of a shame that those things had to happen to him. But I guess it's his own fault. 

5 things down, many more to go. Although I'm going to try to focus it on things that he has a more significant role in, rather than things that he's only in one scene. 

Also, I just had a new idea. If I become a movie director and I want to make a journalism related movie, I'll set it in what is now the current day. I think that could be interesting and should be far enough in the past by the time that I theoretically become a movie director. 

Movie review: Jarhead

So begins the task of watching the entire/as much as possible filmography of Peter Sarsgaard, my newest favorite actor.

This movie is a war movie, which I purportedly do not like, but still for some reason continue to watch... the reason for watching this one is because of a certain actor being in it. He looked pretty nice in this movie despite being nearly bald as a Marine. At least he didn't have awful facial hair. He talked nicely in this movie, and I enjoyed that. In some interview of him I think he mentioned perhaps he has a nice voice because he's from southern Illinois (or was it Indiana? One of those midwestern I states). Regardless of how it came about, he has a pleasant sounding voice. He should read an audiobook as well. I would pay money for that, which is saying something.

It was sort of different than what I guess I expected. The colors were.. notable in that the movie looked very bright. It did take place in the desert so I assume the brightness was to convey the brightness of the middle eastern desert. Sam Mendes directed this movie, which is interesting because he also directed Skyfall, which is one of my favorite movies. I didn't know that he had directed this movie until seeing his name in the opening credits. The cinematography was also done by the same person who did the cinematography for Skyfall, which was very well done in terms of cinematography. Interesting, right? 

The beginning of the movie bore similarities to Full Metal Jacket, replete with the "There are many like it, but this one is mine" and other boot camp particularities. There was actually less killing in this movie, it seems, than there might have been, which was kind of unique for a war movie. My favorite quote from this movie is "Every war is different. Every war is the same." The movie was based on an autobiographical book/memoir which might be interesting to read if I can get my hands on a copy sometime. I would say that I actually decently liked this movie, which kind of surprised me. I haven't watched any movies set during the Gulf War aside from this one, so the change of war settings was interesting. This movie was definitely less brutal than Saving Private Ryan. 

I found this interesting interview with the director.

As a closing thought, I wonder why the Middle Eastern countries can't seem to get it together. Since before I was born there's been violent conflict there. And it continues to this day. At least Bush isn't president anymore (not that I was really old enough to truly realize the significance of his presidency when he was president, but regardless), but what we've got now is decidedly worse for other reasons. 

Movie review: The Magnificent Seven

Well, I eventually did end up watching this thing. It was not quite as much of a waste of time as I had feared it might be, but it wasn't particularly striking or anything. Very meh. But somewhat better than Apocalypse Now, at the very least.

Most of the movie consists of people shooting at each other, which... eh. In that aspect it was rather similar to a war movie, one of which I rewatched earlier today. 

It takes place in the wild west which like I have mentioned before is not my favorite setting. The actors in it, for the most part, looked rather rugged and rough. Which is not my preferred look. Not to mention the facial hair. There was an abundance of facial hair. This was definitely not one of my favorite Vincent roles. He had this very weird accent in the movie. It completely did not sound like his regular voice at all, which disappointed me because I like his regular voice. He was large and hairy and unattractive looking in this movie. I still like him as an actor, I just don't particularly care for this particular role of his. 

Peter Sarsgaard played the villain in this movie, and although he did have a bit of an accent, some of his regular voice shone through, which I was pleased about. Spoiler: Unfortunately his character got killed by one of the other characters, and even though he was the villain, I was still kind of unhappy that he had to get killed off. Alas. 

One of the characters is a knife thrower and I thought that was interesting and now I kind of want to learn how to throw knives. I wonder how difficult it is. I also wonder if I'd ever theoretically have an occasion to use my knife throwing skills in the event that I learn how to throw knives. 

Although they are only in the background in some of the scenes, I thought that the wild western prostitutes had interesting outfits in this movie. It could be interesting to incorporate some of those fashions into my wardrobe. 

It would be quite something (in a bad way) if current times were like the wild west where everyone had guns and was constantly shooting at people. 

Full Metal Jacket, revisited

You-know-what came back on Netflix this month, and since I'm reticent to watch that one western movie, I decided to rewatch, of all things, Full Metal Jacket. 

So, I think that maybe I have found a new appreciation, or something, for this movie.. yes, I still think it's kind of weird, but it's... fairly decent. It's better than Apocalypse Now, at least. I wonder what kind of statement Stanley Kubrick was trying to make with this movie. I also am still not really sure what the significance of the singing in the last minutes of the movie is. It kind of reminded me of when I caught the last ~30 minutes of some other war movie on television one morning and the ending was of the soldiers' family members in a bar/restaurant singing a patriotic song. It was kind of weird. 

Speaking of war movies, I do not think that I would want to be in the military based on what I've seen in war movies. I wonder how accurate war movies are to the actual experience of being in the military. If I ever have the chance to strike up a conversation with someone who's been in the military, I'd like to know what it was like for them since that's not something I'm familiar with. 

Rewatching this movie also gave me an idea for a graphic t shirt design. "Born to Kill" and a peace sign. I think that could be interesting. I wonder what people would think if they saw someone wearing a shirt that had that design on it. Would they recognize it as a reference to Full Metal Jacket? Would they even care? 

I got to thinking about what, theoretically, I would make a war movie about if I were a movie director and directing one. As far as I'm aware, there haven't been any well known war movies directed by women so there's a hole in the market there. I think I would want to do an in depth look at how a soldier is affected (destroyed - more so mentally, probably, but also possibly physically) by war. I would want it to be kind of brutal, but also thoughtful and beautiful in a way. It would be a war movie with a feminine touch. That's probably not something you hear all the time. I would want it to be the Requiem for a Dream of war movies, with all that that entails. Although Requiem was actually not directed by a woman. It's still a very good movie, in my opinion. So now the only question is, which war do I set it in? I think it would be interesting to have the main character be drafted, as it creates the situation of him being thrust into the war out of his control and I like that idea and the dynamic it creates. I wonder what it takes to be a famous director like Stanley Kubrick or Martin Scorsese or Steven Spielberg, etc. I'm not sure if David Fincher and Christopher Nolan and Darren Aronofsky are quite as famous as the others, but they're still up there somewhere. 

There actually happens to be a war movie that Peter Sarsgaard was in, so I'd like to watch that, probably, sometime eventually. You can definitely expect me to review that. 

Blog appearance

Wouldn't it be weird if I died somehow (maybe by murder, maybe by a more innocuous method, who knows) and people read my blog after my death??? I wonder what that would be like and what kind of an impression my blog would leave on people. I wonder if this blog gives off the impression that I am fascinated by death (and drug addicts). Speaking of drug addicts, I think it could be interesting to learn about drug addiction from a sociological standpoint. Sociology and linguistics (and pyschology as well, I guess) are areas that are very interesting to me and it angers me that linguists are not as appreciated as engineers. I wonder what it would be like to work in a modern art museum and choose the artwork that gets to be shown in the museum. I think that would be an interesting thing to do, among other things. Maybe someone would do artwork about drug addicts and I could choose to have that exhibited in the museum. I wonder if there's a museum about drugs somewhere. Speaking of drug addicts, it turns out that the National Institute on Drug Abuse has their office not that far away. Maybe I should pay them a visit sometime. I wonder if there's anything worth going to their office for, however. 

I forgot that the Champions League final was the previous weekend and therefore I wasn't able to watch it. I didn't want for Real Madrid to win. 

Anyways, there look to be some new themes available for blogspot blogs, which on one hand are kind of nice looking, but on the other hand I like the functionality of my current one, rather than a newer more funky looking modern one.

I wonder when/how I'll stumble upon my next favorite actor, and also who it will be. I haven't seen eyelashes guy on tv in awhile. The last time he was on, I didn't even really pay attention to what he said. His eyelashes are still nice and eyelashy though. I wonder if he hasn't been on as often as in the past and that's why I haven't seen him. Or maybe it's because I haven't been watching the news as much.