Well, it was bound to happen eventually - eyelashes guy saying something stupid. I sort of liked him, you know, but...
(For those who are not familiar with eyelashes guy: he is a conservative political commentator on CNN and I refer to him as eyelashes guy because what drew my attention to him was that he had really long, noticeable eyelashes. I refer to him as eyelashes guy as well because I kinda don't want him to stumble upon my blog posts fawning over his magnificent eyelashes if he happened to google his name or something because that would just be weird. See the latter half of this post for elaboration on eyelashes guy.)
The stupid thing that eyelashes guy said today is that he thinks/hopes Trump will be a good president. It's stupid because that's what many people, namely conservatives like eyelashes guy, were saying (... no pun intended) throughout the course of Trump's campaign. That he was eventually going to change and start being more presidential. As we saw, that did not happen, so what reason does anyone have to believe that suddenly now that change is going to happen? That is why I think that what eyelashes guy said today is stupid. He still has nice eyelashes, but this is definitely another thing I disagree with him on. Which I suppose isn't particularly surprising seeing as he is a conservative and I am definitely not. Eyelashes guy hopes that Trump is a successful president, which... is not something that I can conscientiously agree with, because it would mean that many of his absolutely abhorrent and appalling policies that he's proposed would be put into action and that the things he stands for (racism, misogyny, xenophobia, ad infinitum) would be normalized in our society, which is something that we just can't stand for. But I guess it's easy for eyelashes guy to say what he said since, well, he has a lot less to lose with Trump as president, being a straight, white man.. :p he doesn't have to worry about racism, misogyny, women's rights, LGBTQ rights, etc because they don't directly affect him as a straight, white, man.
My (Rachel, a future staving linguist and/or journalist) personal blog and part-time unofficial Peter Sarsgaard fansite. This is a blog about, really, a ton of random ramblings of mine. This blog's posts usually cover "a... unique topic" according to one reader.. Maybe it's more of an online journal of mine. Sometimes I write about music, movies, and tv, in addition to whatever else comes to mind that I deem worthy to write about. Have fun (hopefully) reading it!
Friday, November 11, 2016
Update re: eyelashes guy
Monday, November 7, 2016
Song review: Still Breathing
Here is another song review, sort of similar to the one I did awhile back about Barbarism Begins at Home. Which, as you may remember, was not a positive review.
Today's, or rather, tonight's song review is of a new song by the band Green Day. I don't have any particular strong opinions towards Green Day; I only know a few of their more famous songs, American Idiot and Boulevard of Broken Dreams (another song that I particularly like, even more so than any Green Day song I know, that has "boulevard" in the title is Stars and Boulevards by Augustana) being some of them.
This song is from a new album they recently released called Revolution Radio (I think?). The song is called Still Breathing. I listened to it because I saw a link to an article about it. It was a decent song, not particularly irritating or anything, but rather safe and bland and not particularly profound or anything. There is an excessive use of similes in this song. Speaking of which, there is a sort of similar thing going on in the song Ash and Ember, another one by Augustana, with comparisons/descriptions of events that are relevant to the themes in the song, but Dan manages to do it in a way that does not involve excessive use of similes although there is some use of metaphors and one simile in the chorus of the song - "like a phoenix rising up from ash and ember." All in all it is a very good song like many other songs that he has written over the years. But I digress.
Back on topic now.
This is no American Idiot, or Citizen Erased (a song by Muse that is like 7 minutes long and quite something) or Demolition Lovers (a My Chemical Romance song that just happened to come on shuffle right as I'm writing this, after I listened to Stars and Boulevards which I felt like listening to because I mentioned it earlier on in the post) or Bullet with Butterfly Wings (a song by another band, the Smashing Pumpkins, which I don't even like, but that song is... it's... it has a certain edge to it). I don't exactly have a ton more to say about this song. It wasn't particularly impressive or anything. It might grow on me a little bit, but that's not going to change the fact that it's a bland, and dare I say, cliche kind of song. It almost feels insincere in a way. For some reason. I never thought of Green Day as the epitome of songwriting (Dan from Augustana is the epitome of songwriting, for me), but I expected a little better than this. It's a rather generic pop-type song.
I may possibly listen to other songs from that album, but probably not the whole album. Maybe there's another single from it, I don't know. If any new opinions about this song pop into my head, I might add them here but I can't guarantee that new opinions about this song will come to me.
As an afterthought, I decided to attempt a bit of an analysis of this song. I have taken some of the similes and other important phrases in the song and looked at what I associate with them. Some of the things are paraphrased from how they are in the song. These are just some very roughly thought out ideas, straight from brain to screen (rather than paper) so they may not be the most coherent but I haven't bothered to clean them up into a clearer form.
child looking at horizon - hope, naivete, wonder, innocence
ambulance with sirens - sense of urgency
son without father - lost, identity crisis (sort of), loneliness?
struggling mother - desperation
addict getting clean - hope but also the possibility of failure, a difficult task
gambler losing the last of their money - also desperation
soldier coming home for first time / dodged bullet and walked across landmine - brush with death, relief, emotional attachments to people (family/etc)
find home for restless - not finding a place to belong
bleeding from the storm? - chaos, have I survived it unscathed?
above the rain and roses - ?? rain -> sadness; roses: thorns? Things that are beautiful but also have a more unpleasant side?
shine a light into the wreckage -
are you scared to death to live?
The count: (like in that one post I did about eyeballs and eyelashes)
times I made positive/glowing remarks about Dan/Augustana (even though this post is supposed to be about a Green Day song): 3
Today's, or rather, tonight's song review is of a new song by the band Green Day. I don't have any particular strong opinions towards Green Day; I only know a few of their more famous songs, American Idiot and Boulevard of Broken Dreams (another song that I particularly like, even more so than any Green Day song I know, that has "boulevard" in the title is Stars and Boulevards by Augustana) being some of them.
This song is from a new album they recently released called Revolution Radio (I think?). The song is called Still Breathing. I listened to it because I saw a link to an article about it. It was a decent song, not particularly irritating or anything, but rather safe and bland and not particularly profound or anything. There is an excessive use of similes in this song. Speaking of which, there is a sort of similar thing going on in the song Ash and Ember, another one by Augustana, with comparisons/descriptions of events that are relevant to the themes in the song, but Dan manages to do it in a way that does not involve excessive use of similes although there is some use of metaphors and one simile in the chorus of the song - "like a phoenix rising up from ash and ember." All in all it is a very good song like many other songs that he has written over the years. But I digress.
Back on topic now.
This is no American Idiot, or Citizen Erased (a song by Muse that is like 7 minutes long and quite something) or Demolition Lovers (a My Chemical Romance song that just happened to come on shuffle right as I'm writing this, after I listened to Stars and Boulevards which I felt like listening to because I mentioned it earlier on in the post) or Bullet with Butterfly Wings (a song by another band, the Smashing Pumpkins, which I don't even like, but that song is... it's... it has a certain edge to it). I don't exactly have a ton more to say about this song. It wasn't particularly impressive or anything. It might grow on me a little bit, but that's not going to change the fact that it's a bland, and dare I say, cliche kind of song. It almost feels insincere in a way. For some reason. I never thought of Green Day as the epitome of songwriting (Dan from Augustana is the epitome of songwriting, for me), but I expected a little better than this. It's a rather generic pop-type song.
I may possibly listen to other songs from that album, but probably not the whole album. Maybe there's another single from it, I don't know. If any new opinions about this song pop into my head, I might add them here but I can't guarantee that new opinions about this song will come to me.
As an afterthought, I decided to attempt a bit of an analysis of this song. I have taken some of the similes and other important phrases in the song and looked at what I associate with them. Some of the things are paraphrased from how they are in the song. These are just some very roughly thought out ideas, straight from brain to screen (rather than paper) so they may not be the most coherent but I haven't bothered to clean them up into a clearer form.
child looking at horizon - hope, naivete, wonder, innocence
ambulance with sirens - sense of urgency
son without father - lost, identity crisis (sort of), loneliness?
struggling mother - desperation
addict getting clean - hope but also the possibility of failure, a difficult task
gambler losing the last of their money - also desperation
soldier coming home for first time / dodged bullet and walked across landmine - brush with death, relief, emotional attachments to people (family/etc)
find home for restless - not finding a place to belong
bleeding from the storm? - chaos, have I survived it unscathed?
above the rain and roses - ?? rain -> sadness; roses: thorns? Things that are beautiful but also have a more unpleasant side?
shine a light into the wreckage -
are you scared to death to live?
The count: (like in that one post I did about eyeballs and eyelashes)
times I made positive/glowing remarks about Dan/Augustana (even though this post is supposed to be about a Green Day song): 3
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Movie review: Born on the 4th of July
First things first, I think the real question is why do I keep subjecting myself to war movies that are almost inevitably weird? With that in mind, I went into watching this movie thinking that it would probably be at least a bit weird like Full Metal Jacket (as you can see, that movie has stuck with me nevertheless) and Apocalypse Now, which was even weirder than FMJ. And again, also didn't have the virtue of having Vincent D'Onofrio even though he was fat and unsightly in FMJ.
In any case, this movie that I just watched has Tom Cruise in it. I have no particular strong opinions towards Tom Cruise but I think I like him a bit more than George Clooney and even Brad Pitt. The movie was based on events that happened to a real person, and apparently said person wrote a book so I think I may have to try and read that sometime. Incidentally, Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now were also based on books (The Short Timers and Heart of Darkness, respectively, both of which I have read). The plot is about a young man who joins the Marines (which were also featured in FMJ, however this movie did not have the boot camp scenes like FMJ did. I saw a jelly doughnut the other day and thought about FMJ) to go fight in the Vietnam War. Initially, he is enthusiastic about serving his country as he had always dreamed of doing such since he was a young boy. However, in Vietnam he ends up accidentally killing a number of helpless civilians as well as a fellow soldier (also accidentally). In short order he gets shot through the back (in the scene, you can see a huge bloody hole in his back) which leaves him paralyzed. He returns to the US and spends time in a veteran's hospital which is decidedly unpleasant. These events eventually cause him to become disillusioned about the war and become an anti-war activist.
Similarities and differences:
This movie took a different approach than FMJ; in FMJ the main character(s) - Joker and Private Pyle who meets an unfortunate end at his own hands - are kind of just thrown into the whole war thing - they are more passive than Tom Cruise's character in Born on the 4th of July. FMJ also takes place entirely before and during the time that Joker goes to Vietnam; it ends with a scene of him still in Vietnam reflecting on the events that have happened since the beginning of the movie. It's sort of an interesting final scene, very stark; as I remember it, they are marching through somewhere with flames in the background, it's dark and they're chanting ironically a children's song. Joker says that he is "no longer afraid." Reflecting on FMJ, I begin to wonder what happened to Joker after the end of the movie. I don't remember if the book went on to describe events after what were shown in the movie. For some reason, I feel like what happens to him is that he eventually gets killed in Vietnam.
The movie reminded me a bit of the scenes in Forrest Gump where Forrest fights in the Vietnam War as well as what happens after that, in that he (Forrest) has a lady friend (Jenny) who is a hippie and involved in anti-war protests. A similar thing is seen in Born on the 4th of July - Tom Cruise's character has a lady friend who is also a hippie and an anti-war protester. However, Forrest Gump has a much lighter tone than Born on the 4th of July.
In FMJ, there is a scene where Joker is in a helicopter and watching another soldier shoot at civilians on the ground. Joker asks of him "How can you shoot women and children?" In Born on the 4th of July, there's kind of a similar scene in that civilians get killed but it's different than the one in FMJ.
Incidentally I feel like I should mention that there was a lot of profanity in this movie. I wasn't particularly bothered, but there was a lot. So maybe don't watch this movie around other people if they would be bothered by the profanity.
In any case, I was quite surprised that this war movie was NOT weird. Perhaps that was because it didn't take place entirely in the war zone, like the other ones I've seen. It also made me wonder if there are such things as pro war movies, seeing as this one and FMJ can be considered anti-war movies. Tom Cruise did a good job of acting in this movie, I think. I would be inclined to watch other movies that he's been in, perhaps.
Further reading:
Here is an interesting article that offers some additional relevant commentary on Born on the 4th of July; mainly (tl;dr here) that it is prescient and still relevant to today's society; unlike other Vietnam War movies like FMJ and Apocalypse Now that are more bound to the times they were made in.
Here is an article with some trivia about the movie.
In any case, this movie that I just watched has Tom Cruise in it. I have no particular strong opinions towards Tom Cruise but I think I like him a bit more than George Clooney and even Brad Pitt. The movie was based on events that happened to a real person, and apparently said person wrote a book so I think I may have to try and read that sometime. Incidentally, Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now were also based on books (The Short Timers and Heart of Darkness, respectively, both of which I have read). The plot is about a young man who joins the Marines (which were also featured in FMJ, however this movie did not have the boot camp scenes like FMJ did. I saw a jelly doughnut the other day and thought about FMJ) to go fight in the Vietnam War. Initially, he is enthusiastic about serving his country as he had always dreamed of doing such since he was a young boy. However, in Vietnam he ends up accidentally killing a number of helpless civilians as well as a fellow soldier (also accidentally). In short order he gets shot through the back (in the scene, you can see a huge bloody hole in his back) which leaves him paralyzed. He returns to the US and spends time in a veteran's hospital which is decidedly unpleasant. These events eventually cause him to become disillusioned about the war and become an anti-war activist.
Similarities and differences:
This movie took a different approach than FMJ; in FMJ the main character(s) - Joker and Private Pyle who meets an unfortunate end at his own hands - are kind of just thrown into the whole war thing - they are more passive than Tom Cruise's character in Born on the 4th of July. FMJ also takes place entirely before and during the time that Joker goes to Vietnam; it ends with a scene of him still in Vietnam reflecting on the events that have happened since the beginning of the movie. It's sort of an interesting final scene, very stark; as I remember it, they are marching through somewhere with flames in the background, it's dark and they're chanting ironically a children's song. Joker says that he is "no longer afraid." Reflecting on FMJ, I begin to wonder what happened to Joker after the end of the movie. I don't remember if the book went on to describe events after what were shown in the movie. For some reason, I feel like what happens to him is that he eventually gets killed in Vietnam.
The movie reminded me a bit of the scenes in Forrest Gump where Forrest fights in the Vietnam War as well as what happens after that, in that he (Forrest) has a lady friend (Jenny) who is a hippie and involved in anti-war protests. A similar thing is seen in Born on the 4th of July - Tom Cruise's character has a lady friend who is also a hippie and an anti-war protester. However, Forrest Gump has a much lighter tone than Born on the 4th of July.
In FMJ, there is a scene where Joker is in a helicopter and watching another soldier shoot at civilians on the ground. Joker asks of him "How can you shoot women and children?" In Born on the 4th of July, there's kind of a similar scene in that civilians get killed but it's different than the one in FMJ.
Incidentally I feel like I should mention that there was a lot of profanity in this movie. I wasn't particularly bothered, but there was a lot. So maybe don't watch this movie around other people if they would be bothered by the profanity.
In any case, I was quite surprised that this war movie was NOT weird. Perhaps that was because it didn't take place entirely in the war zone, like the other ones I've seen. It also made me wonder if there are such things as pro war movies, seeing as this one and FMJ can be considered anti-war movies. Tom Cruise did a good job of acting in this movie, I think. I would be inclined to watch other movies that he's been in, perhaps.
Further reading:
Here is an interesting article that offers some additional relevant commentary on Born on the 4th of July; mainly (tl;dr here) that it is prescient and still relevant to today's society; unlike other Vietnam War movies like FMJ and Apocalypse Now that are more bound to the times they were made in.
Here is an article with some trivia about the movie.
Sunday, October 30, 2016
Ponderings about a Law and Order DVD
Today I happened to go to what some might call a thrift store, but I don't consider Goodwill or the Salvation Army to be thrift stores. A thrift store I feel is a slightly fancier establishment where you go to find *vintage* outfits. In any case. At Goodwill I was looking at the DVD section where there was a bookshelf of DVDs. The selection was more interesting than what you might find at a regular store like Target. The selection was more eclectic and it included things like Zoolander and seasons one and three of Arrested Development, which I would have gotten but that show is on Netflix. Zoolander used to be on Netflix but it isn't anymore. There was also a movie with Tom Cruise called Collateral which looked kind of interesting. And Syriana which I don't really know what it is about but it has George Clooney in it, which made me not want to get it because I think George Clooney is an idiot. They had an interesting assortment, definitely. One thing that caught my eye was the DVD "Law and Order Crime Scenes," which features 8 episodes "personally selected by Dick Wolf." I am looking forwards to watching them sometime hopefully soon. This, by the way, is the original Law and Order and not Law and Order CI, which I refer to by just Law and Order since that's the one I watch the most even though it technically is Law and Order CI instead of just Law and Order. (I really kinda doubt that people care what I refer to the various versions of Law and Order as.) Of course, encountering this DVD made me start having some wonderings. Obviously, some person residing presumably in the county (seeing as I assume someone from outside the county would go to a different Goodwill in their county that presumably would be closer) didn't want their Law and Order DVD anymore. It makes me wonder why though, why they decided to donate their DVD to Goodwill. The DVD is from 2003 as on the back it mentions that the show had been on for 13 years. This means the DVD is rather old, comparatively, and could perhaps sort of be referred to as an antique. In a way, I guess. I feel like DVDs weren't all that common in 2003 and it almost would make more sense for it to be on a videotape. They had VCR players at Goodwill too for the record. What were the thoughts running through this person's head when they decided to get rid of their Law and Order DVD? Who was this person? Was it a man, a woman, and how old? What were their personal thoughts about Law and Order? I feel like they must have liked the show a decent amount because they sprang for a DVD of 8 episodes personally selected by Dick Wolf. That's just my inference and I could be wrong. Perhaps they were cleaning out their basement or something, wherever they happened to find this DVD and thought they ought to donate it. Maybe it belonged to someone they knew/lived with who liked Law and Order but had passed on and now this person was going through their belongings. I don't know but I really wonder. Was the DVD loved and cherished by someone who decided it was time to let go of it? Or was it someone who bought it on a whim and didn't even really like Law and Order and maybe never even really watched it in full? Who knows! I just really would like to know the whole story behind the previous owner of this DVD and why they decided they didn't want it anymore. I think it's a rather snazzy DVD case design - it has on the front over a black background (like the screen that says EXECUTIVE PRODUCER DICK WOLF at the end of every Law and Order episode) the title of the DVD in a medium gray color that doesn't stand out a lot. That consists of the Law and Order logo and a subtitle underneath it in a different font, Arial Narrow or something along those lines that says "episodes selected by Dick Wolf" except in all capitals. I think it's a nicely designed cover and not too garish although garish things certainly can have a place in life. Along the spine is a yellow portion that extends slightly onto the front and back with the words "CRIME SCENES" in black, like how it would look on police tape and superimposed over that is "Law and Order Crime Scenes" in a smaller font. On the back there is a little summary and a list of the 8 episodes featured on the DVD. My mother thinks it's not natural to wonder so deeply about the story behind a used DVD, but I still wonder. She thinks it's as simple as that someone didn't want it anymore, but I want to know the whole story behind it. I'm curious to watch the episodes and try to see why Dick Wolf decided to pick these 8 to go on the DVD.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
War movies
(they are weird.)
Last weekend I was awake sort of early so I went downstairs and looked to see what was on television. I looked through the channel guide and it turned out that on some channel there was a movie about the Vietnam War that I had not seen. Mind you, I have only seen two aside from that one that I only managed to catch the last half hour of. Unsurprisingly, this last half hour part was weird. This movie was called The Deer Hunter and it was from the 70s. I had to go look up what had happened in the earlier parts of the movie since only seeing the last half hour didn't make much sense. The movie had a number of scenes with Russian roulette which was... different. It also contributed to me thinking that it was a strange movie. If someone can show me a movie about the Vietnam War that I don't think is weird, they deserve a prize. Full Metal Jacket was weird. Apocalypse Now was even weirder and it didn't even have the virtue of having (a fat and unsightly) Vincent D'Onofrio in it. Neither did The Deer Hunter for that matter. This may be a futile effort, but I would give the movie Saving Private Ryan a chance even though it is also a war movie. But maybe it isn't weird. I wouldn't know because I haven't watched it yet. It has Tom Hanks in it.
I decided that I wouldn't watch anymore war movies after I wasted 3 hours watching Apocalypse Now, but it seems that I did not keep that resolution. At least this time it was only a half hour of my time that I spent watching part of a war movie. If/when I watch Saving Private Ryan or perhaps some other war movie, I will be sure to post a review of it.
Last weekend I was awake sort of early so I went downstairs and looked to see what was on television. I looked through the channel guide and it turned out that on some channel there was a movie about the Vietnam War that I had not seen. Mind you, I have only seen two aside from that one that I only managed to catch the last half hour of. Unsurprisingly, this last half hour part was weird. This movie was called The Deer Hunter and it was from the 70s. I had to go look up what had happened in the earlier parts of the movie since only seeing the last half hour didn't make much sense. The movie had a number of scenes with Russian roulette which was... different. It also contributed to me thinking that it was a strange movie. If someone can show me a movie about the Vietnam War that I don't think is weird, they deserve a prize. Full Metal Jacket was weird. Apocalypse Now was even weirder and it didn't even have the virtue of having (a fat and unsightly) Vincent D'Onofrio in it. Neither did The Deer Hunter for that matter. This may be a futile effort, but I would give the movie Saving Private Ryan a chance even though it is also a war movie. But maybe it isn't weird. I wouldn't know because I haven't watched it yet. It has Tom Hanks in it.
I decided that I wouldn't watch anymore war movies after I wasted 3 hours watching Apocalypse Now, but it seems that I did not keep that resolution. At least this time it was only a half hour of my time that I spent watching part of a war movie. If/when I watch Saving Private Ryan or perhaps some other war movie, I will be sure to post a review of it.
Public transporation stories, part 1: hands
Today, not even a half hour ago, I was on the bus. It was kind of crowded so I went towards the back to find a seat. I happened to sit next to some man. He was youngish and had reddish brown hair and facial hair which I thought he ought to shave. Regardless. He had some very nice hands that I noticed and I kept looking at them, trying to make it not that obvious. It reminded me of the time a few years ago when I was getting a new phone at the Verizon store. The man who was helping us also had quite nice hands and fingernails. His hands were nice and elegant looking. I was considering talking to this man on the bus. He might have been left handed. I was thinking of complimenting him on his hands and saying they remind me of Vincent D'Onofrio, and mention that if he wasn't aware of who Vincent D'Onofrio is, that he was in Full Metal Jacket back in the 80s and also recently in the Netflix series Daredevil. And I was going to ask if he was left handed, and then mention that Vincent is as well and so am I. He was reading a book for part of the ride yet I didn't catch the title of it. I saw the words on the top of one page which said "Virtues of good breeding" but that doesn't really tell me much. Eventually he put the book away and seemed to be looking out the windows. Or maybe he was looking at me. I'm not sure. He had grayish eyeballs and in the pocket of his bag there was a light purple bandana and some tea bags, or at least that's what they looked like through the mesh. I kept looking at him and trying to restrain myself from giving him a strange compliment (this is why I need to be kept away from Vincent D'Onofrio and the guy with the eyelashes because I would give them strange compliments about some of their body parts if I happened to encounter them in person, probably). I was wondering which stop he was going to get off at. Eventually, the bus came to where I needed to go and I pulled the string. It gives me a small pleasure to be the person to pull the string. It ever so slightly irritates me when someone else who is getting off at the same stop I am pulls the string before I do. It ever so slightly irritates me. In any case, I did get to be the person to pull the string on this occasion and I was getting ready to get off and it turned out that it was this man's stop too. So as I was getting off the bus I said to him, "You have nice hands." This is very reminiscent of a compliment I gave someone else out of the blue a couple years ago. Only that time I was complimenting said person's teeth. I definitely consider that to have been a strange compliment. The man thanked me for the compliment and I said "You're welcome" and got off the bus. I was quite pleased with myself. I wonder what that man thought about this... incident. Perhaps his thoughts are "Some girl gave me a strange compliment today. It was weird." I wouldn't be surprised if those are his thoughts.
This post exemplifies my character traits of people watching and strange compliment giving, which I look forwards to doing more of in the future.
This post exemplifies my character traits of people watching and strange compliment giving, which I look forwards to doing more of in the future.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
The Law and Order Candidate: a satirical short story (Introduction)
What if Donald Trump were arrested by detectives from the Law and Order shows? This satirical short story explores that idea.
You, the reader, will probably get more out of this story if you are familiar with the shows Law and Order SVU and Law and Order CI. In a typical episode of a Law and Order show, a crime is committed, an investigation ensues, the criminal(s) is/are arrested, they are interrogated, then prosecuted in a trial by the District Attorney. Each episode of a Law and Order show begins with a short narrated introduction statement. Kind of like how it is in the show Arrested Development.
For those of you who are not familiar with the Law and Order shows, a brief introduction to the characters you will see in this story:
Detectives Elliot Stabler (left) and Olivia Benson (right), from Law and Order SVU (Special Victims Unit - investigates sex crimes)
Elliot is known to have anger management issues. See here.
"In the criminal justice system, sexually based offenses are considered especially heinous. The dedicated detectives who investigate these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as the Special Victims Unit. These are their stories."
Detectives Robert (Bobby) Goren and Alexandra (Alex) Eames, from Law and Order Criminal Intent (my personal favorite), a more psychological take on the Law and Order formula.
Goren is sort of a Sherlock-esque character and, continuing the Sherlock comparison, Eames is more like Watson. Goren is also 6'4" and likes to psychologically intimidate people (mainly the criminals).
"In New York City's war on crime, the worst criminal offenders are pursued by the detectives of the Major Case Squad. These are their stories."
No characters from the original Law and Order are present in this story, but here is the introductory narration anyways. "In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate, yet equally important groups. The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories."
I consider this story to be satire, but some may consider it to simply be a bad fanfiction. Regardless, I hope you are amused at least a little bit.
For reference, here is what Vincent D'Onofrio's (actor who played Detective Goren) hands look like:
This is the little leaning thing he does. It's a quirk of the character.
And here is what Donald Trump's hands look like:
You, the reader, will probably get more out of this story if you are familiar with the shows Law and Order SVU and Law and Order CI. In a typical episode of a Law and Order show, a crime is committed, an investigation ensues, the criminal(s) is/are arrested, they are interrogated, then prosecuted in a trial by the District Attorney. Each episode of a Law and Order show begins with a short narrated introduction statement. Kind of like how it is in the show Arrested Development.
For those of you who are not familiar with the Law and Order shows, a brief introduction to the characters you will see in this story:
Detectives Elliot Stabler (left) and Olivia Benson (right), from Law and Order SVU (Special Victims Unit - investigates sex crimes)
"In the criminal justice system, sexually based offenses are considered especially heinous. The dedicated detectives who investigate these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as the Special Victims Unit. These are their stories."
Detectives Robert (Bobby) Goren and Alexandra (Alex) Eames, from Law and Order Criminal Intent (my personal favorite), a more psychological take on the Law and Order formula.
Goren is sort of a Sherlock-esque character and, continuing the Sherlock comparison, Eames is more like Watson. Goren is also 6'4" and likes to psychologically intimidate people (mainly the criminals).
"In New York City's war on crime, the worst criminal offenders are pursued by the detectives of the Major Case Squad. These are their stories."
No characters from the original Law and Order are present in this story, but here is the introductory narration anyways. "In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate, yet equally important groups. The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories."
I consider this story to be satire, but some may consider it to simply be a bad fanfiction. Regardless, I hope you are amused at least a little bit.
For reference, here is what Vincent D'Onofrio's (actor who played Detective Goren) hands look like:
And here is what Donald Trump's hands look like:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)