My (Rachel, a future staving linguist and/or journalist) personal blog and part-time unofficial Peter Sarsgaard fansite. This is a blog about, really, a ton of random ramblings of mine. This blog's posts usually cover "a... unique topic" according to one reader.. Maybe it's more of an online journal of mine. Sometimes I write about music, movies, and tv, in addition to whatever else comes to mind that I deem worthy to write about. Have fun (hopefully) reading it!
Sunday, May 7, 2017
TV review: Black Mirror
I don't think it's necessarily the sci fi aspect of the show that I didn't like. There are some older episodes of Doctor Who that are plenty sci-fi-y that I have enjoyed (10th Doctor era). One of the things I wasn't a fan of was the dialogue. There was something about it that I didn't like the way it was written. Something. I can't really say exactly what.
I also think it's possible that I wasn't hugely thrilled because of the characters and that I wasn't familiar with them. A show that you know the characters of (in my case, Law and Order) I would say is inherently more compelling because you care more about/want to see what happens regarding the main characters.
The third thing is that the episode seemed like an amalgamation of a variety of concepts with some sci fi thrown in, which the end result was actually fairly cheesy. I think the idea of the show was for it to be profound/avant-garde or something like that, but I didn't find it to be that way. A few of the concepts that made up this episode: Nazis/genocide, mind control, war - dehumanizing the enemy/the horror, the horror. I think the sci fi aspect mixed with those concepts had the end result of a cheesy episode. I'm not sure if any of the other episodes will be better. I may give it another chance of one episode, but if I don't like the next one I watch, I'm not going to waste more of my time.
In other matters, I rewatched Shutter Island today and that was fun. Mark Ruffalo had really short hair in that movie compared to other times and it was different. However, he has a hairier chest than Leonardo DiCaprio. I have actually watched a decent number of movies he's been in - Shutter Island, Reservation Road, Zodiac, Spotlight. Shutter Island is the only one of his movies that I found to be particularly good. The others were somewhere in the range of mediocre. I wonder if there are any other good movies he's been in. I wish Vincent had been in more movies that I think I would want to watch, but alas, I guess he was busy being in Law and Order for around 10 years which didn't leave him time to be in a lot of movies.
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Subject matters
Aside from that, I have done movie reviews which are kind of more normal. I wrote quite a long review/commentary on Saving Private Ryan after watching that movie. Oh! And teeth. That's another interesting and unique subject matter specific to me. And hands.
If any readers have suggestions for other topics that would fit with the existing content of this blog, I'd be open to considering them as possible future post subjects.
Messi's sleeves
Fast forward to now. My Law and Order frenzy has subdued although I still like the various shows a substantial amount.
The other week, I found out that Bayern was playing against Real Madrid in the Champions League. So I watched that game which was an absolute injustice as the general consensus is that the referee was biased in favor of Real Madrid. Then a few days later I found out (I maybe should keep better track of these things if I'm going to be interested in the sport) that Real Madrid would play Barcelona. Anyone who is vaguely familiar with the sport would probably know that Real and Barcelona have a very strong rivalry, so any times they play each other it's a big deal. So naturally I had to watch. Which I did, and I was pleased that Barcelona pulled off a pretty stunning win. And Messi scored his 500th goal. He also got jabbed in the mouth with the elbow of a Real player, causing him to bleed and play the rest of the game with a bandage in his mouth. There are rumors online that he lost a tooth, but I can't verify those and the official team website/social media hasn't said anything about him losing a tooth from that. I would hope that he hasn't sustained severe dental damage.
In any case, onto the main topic of this post. I noticed that in a number of pictures of him where he's wearing a long sleeved shirt, he has the sleeves pulled over his hands a little bit. I'm not sure why this is - is it because he's short and the sleeves are too long? Is it a persistent and unique quirk of his? Do a good number of other players do it? These are the things that I would like to find out and this post is going to be the process of my research where I look at pictures of other players and Messi to try and determine the answers to these very important questions. So here goes.
First of all, in the game against Madrid, after he got jabbed in the mouth and was bleeding, he wiped some of the blood on his pulled-down sleeve. See below. You can see the stain of blood, even.
Then later, after he had scored the winning goal, he took off his shirt to taunt the Real Madrid fans and you can see that his sleeves are pulled down while doing that as well.
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
From a future starving linguist
Anyways, on to the main topic of this post. As the reader may be aware, last weekend there was a march for science in DC, the ideals/goals of which were to promote the idea that science/facts backed by science is important. Which is fine and good, mostly. I agree that facts are important and that our current president is fact-challenged. And sure, science is important and has done lots of good things to improve society, like making innovations in medicine to treat diseases. However, it's also worth thinking about the not so beneficial things that science has given us. (I use science broadly to include innovation and technology and all that as well) Science has developed ever more powerful weapons which allow us to kill people with more efficiency and effectiveness. Machine guns, nuclear weapons, drones, all that.
On to another point. My impression of science as a field in general/the march is that it is heavily focused on the so-called "hard sciences" (is that because they're difficult and tedious to understand/learn about??), meaning chemistry, biology, physics, etc. In other words, areas that I have no interest in and don't care to study. For people who do have an interest in and a passion for these things, more power to them, but it's just not for me. I think that the "soft sciences" are not taken as seriously - psychology, sociology, linguistics (three areas which do interest me). In addition, as far as I'm aware people in professions relating to hard sciences get paid more. I do understand that there are reasons behind this, economical stuff, which I'm not super knowledgeable about and that it may not necessarily be plausible for linguists to paid as much as chemists.
I look at the march with... I don't want to say disdain, but perhaps bitterness is a better word. It disappoints me that certain types of science are not as respected/valued as others. In addition, "science is already seen by society as something that's more valuable than the arts," - A Very Fantastic Artist which is a whole nother can of fish. If I were a biologist I wouldn't be worrying about being a starving biologist, probably. Science is already valued in society even if the particular president doesn't have a very good grip on reality. If it were up to me, I would organize a march/protest to promote valuation of the arts and linguistics/other soft sciences.
And to the next thing. Science/similar fields are heavily dominated by men, which is a documented issue/fact. It's been recognized that (isn't this an interesting sentence structure right there?? Sort of??) there should be more women in those fields, which is something that I agree with - it would be good for that to happen. However, I also personally have minimal interest in being in such a field, so I will not be contributing to having more female scientists. Which I sort of feel slightly bad about, since I do think it's important, but I also don't have an interest in those subjects. Alas.
The thing I wanted to add here: it's possible that my lack of interest in science is because of how I was socialized (this is the sociology class talking). It's not possible to know if/how things would be different (meaning would I be interested in and enjoy science) had I been socialized differently since I can't go back and time and live an alternate universe where somehow I am socialized differently and come to like science. I am trying to figure out how I came to have the interests that I do have, however. I don't really know what could have been done differently, say, 10 years ago in my life or whatever that would have made me like science. I remember in elementary school we grew plants in science class, which was nice. I like plants. (fun fact: the German word for weed (not the marijuana kind, by the way) is "Unkraut") But that's quite different that studying science at a college level. Maybe I should do a sociological study of what causes people to like science... huh. Could be interesting. It might end up being an informal study and draw more upon the area of journalism than scientific research though. That's a possibility. Hmm. Now I just have to find some scientists to study. Studying the scientists - scienception.
An ending thought... My only chance for success as a linguist would be if aliens come to earth. Then maybe I could make it big as a linguist. If only.
Edit: The previously mentioned Very Fantastic Artist complained that I hadn't properly attributed the quote. So I have fixed that. I hope that's enough to prevent any lawsuits.
Monday, April 17, 2017
Songs
Songs that I dislike with a decent amount of passion:
Creep, by Radiohead. This one is a perfect description of that horrible thing, so therefore I don't like it because I would prefer not to listen to music that is reminiscent of that horrible thing.
Every Breath You Take, which is a creepy song if you pay attention to the lyrics.
Pumped Up Kicks, which I dislike because it sounds annoying. It isn't necessarily because of the subject matter, seeing as I enjoy other songs about murderous matters.
A cover of Love Will Tear Us Apart by Fall Out Boy, since it is an awful cover that butchers the original song.
David Bowie gets an honorable mention because he looked weird (for the very most part) and his music was weird (also for the very most part). However, there are two exceptions - one song of his that is actually fairly decent is Something in the Air, and (very surprisingly) he looked... good, at least compared to how he usually looked, in some science fiction movie he starred in back in the 70s.
In addition to these, an assortment of annoying pop songs that have been on the radio in the last 5 to 10 years.
Sunday, April 16, 2017
Have you ever considered online dating?
Have you ever considered the idea of using an online dating website? If yes, my candid advice to you is... don't. If you absolutely must, don't go into it with high expectations at all. Go in to it with the mindset that it is a somewhat unique/more in depth form of people watching (and the people that you see will most likely be no more than average looking at best), which is what I treat it as currently.
Most people that you see on there will probably be ugly, or no better than average looking (based on my experience) and therefore, they are not particularly appealing to me. This might make me shallow (a topic I have mentioned in the past) but I think it is somewhat important for a person you date to be good looking (meaning better than average at least by somewhat).
If you are me, you have a certain person with very blonde margarine-colored hair in mind who is definitely good looking and could be a model (not to mention various actual European models that I know of, or certain favorite actors); the appearances of the people on the online dating website will certainly pale in comparison.
Alas. Anyways, I have pretty much mostly given up on the idea of actually finding someone that I would actually want to date on the online dating website and I use it mostly out of boredom here and there.
Here is a theory: all of the good looking people have already found people to date in real life without the help of an online dating website, so therefore all the average and below average people end up on the online dating website. Does this therefore mean that I'm below average looking?? I think at the very least I am average looking. I certainly am better looking than that horrible thing, for one.
Friday, March 24, 2017
Things to ponder
1. That there will be someone hiding in the bathtub behind the shower curtain
2. That my hair will catch on fire, probably while using the stove
3. That somehow one of my favorite shirts will get ruined.