My (Rachel, a future staving linguist and/or journalist) personal blog and part-time unofficial Peter Sarsgaard fansite. This is a blog about, really, a ton of random ramblings of mine. This blog's posts usually cover "a... unique topic" according to one reader.. Maybe it's more of an online journal of mine. Sometimes I write about music, movies, and tv, in addition to whatever else comes to mind that I deem worthy to write about. Have fun (hopefully) reading it!
Sunday, November 13, 2016
More political stuff
This post again is related to eyelashes guy a bit although not so much about his eyelashes. As mentioned in the past, he is a conservative political journalist/commentator who I only began paying attention to due to his eyelashes; they are very long and noticeable.
In any case, today he put out an episode of his podcast in which he interviewed a family member of his that had voted for Trump. This family member lives in central PA, apparently. (For the record, I never liked PA anyways. Awful bumpy roads and nothing to see. Philadelphia was kind of a disappointment as well, even. I'll take DC or NYC any time over that. To people reading this who may happen to live in PA, I apologize for my negative opinion of your state.) So, this person said that they voted for Trump in spite of the offensive comments he made about groping women. They described those comments as an example something that people say that they're not proud of, but the comments still did not dissuade this person from voting for Trump. The comments are more than just things Trump said that he's not proud of. They are an indication, along with other things he's said and done over the years, that he does not respect women. This, for me, is one of the many things that disqualify him from being a suitable president of this country.
Towards the end of the interview (it was about 15 minutes long) the family member of eyelashes guy mentioned some things that would seem like they could have come out of the mouth of Donald Trump himself, one of which was the phrase "make America great again," among other things. During the interview, eyelashes guy asked his family member about their opinions regarding immigrants relating to Trump's comments/positions about immigration. They mentioned that they had encountered (Latino) immigrants in public where they live and had amiable interactions with them, yet they still voted for Trump. They claimed that Trump's comments about Mexicans being rapists only applied to a certain group of Mexicans. This family member of eyelashes guy does various charitable works in their community, which seems to have been mentioned to prove that this person isn't an entirely horrible person. I crocheted angrily while listening to this podcast because a) podcasts bore me if I'm not knitting or crocheting while listening and b) the things said in the podcast angered me.
That is about all that I have to say for now with regards to things related to eyelashes guy, but stay posted because undoubtedly I'm sure there'll be something in the future that he says that I'll feel compelled to write a blog post responding to, probably because I disagree. As usual, eyelashes guy will remain unnamed because I think it would be weird if he happened to stumble upon my blog posts about him.
The end. (for now)
Saturday, November 12, 2016
Killed by Drones
Friday, November 11, 2016
Update re: eyelashes guy
Well, it was bound to happen eventually - eyelashes guy saying something stupid. I sort of liked him, you know, but...
(For those who are not familiar with eyelashes guy: he is a conservative political commentator on CNN and I refer to him as eyelashes guy because what drew my attention to him was that he had really long, noticeable eyelashes. I refer to him as eyelashes guy as well because I kinda don't want him to stumble upon my blog posts fawning over his magnificent eyelashes if he happened to google his name or something because that would just be weird. See the latter half of this post for elaboration on eyelashes guy.)
The stupid thing that eyelashes guy said today is that he thinks/hopes Trump will be a good president. It's stupid because that's what many people, namely conservatives like eyelashes guy, were saying (... no pun intended) throughout the course of Trump's campaign. That he was eventually going to change and start being more presidential. As we saw, that did not happen, so what reason does anyone have to believe that suddenly now that change is going to happen? That is why I think that what eyelashes guy said today is stupid. He still has nice eyelashes, but this is definitely another thing I disagree with him on. Which I suppose isn't particularly surprising seeing as he is a conservative and I am definitely not. Eyelashes guy hopes that Trump is a successful president, which... is not something that I can conscientiously agree with, because it would mean that many of his absolutely abhorrent and appalling policies that he's proposed would be put into action and that the things he stands for (racism, misogyny, xenophobia, ad infinitum) would be normalized in our society, which is something that we just can't stand for. But I guess it's easy for eyelashes guy to say what he said since, well, he has a lot less to lose with Trump as president, being a straight, white man.. :p he doesn't have to worry about racism, misogyny, women's rights, LGBTQ rights, etc because they don't directly affect him as a straight, white, man.
Monday, November 7, 2016
Song review: Still Breathing
Today's, or rather, tonight's song review is of a new song by the band Green Day. I don't have any particular strong opinions towards Green Day; I only know a few of their more famous songs, American Idiot and Boulevard of Broken Dreams (another song that I particularly like, even more so than any Green Day song I know, that has "boulevard" in the title is Stars and Boulevards by Augustana) being some of them.
This song is from a new album they recently released called Revolution Radio (I think?). The song is called Still Breathing. I listened to it because I saw a link to an article about it. It was a decent song, not particularly irritating or anything, but rather safe and bland and not particularly profound or anything. There is an excessive use of similes in this song. Speaking of which, there is a sort of similar thing going on in the song Ash and Ember, another one by Augustana, with comparisons/descriptions of events that are relevant to the themes in the song, but Dan manages to do it in a way that does not involve excessive use of similes although there is some use of metaphors and one simile in the chorus of the song - "like a phoenix rising up from ash and ember." All in all it is a very good song like many other songs that he has written over the years. But I digress.
Back on topic now.
This is no American Idiot, or Citizen Erased (a song by Muse that is like 7 minutes long and quite something) or Demolition Lovers (a My Chemical Romance song that just happened to come on shuffle right as I'm writing this, after I listened to Stars and Boulevards which I felt like listening to because I mentioned it earlier on in the post) or Bullet with Butterfly Wings (a song by another band, the Smashing Pumpkins, which I don't even like, but that song is... it's... it has a certain edge to it). I don't exactly have a ton more to say about this song. It wasn't particularly impressive or anything. It might grow on me a little bit, but that's not going to change the fact that it's a bland, and dare I say, cliche kind of song. It almost feels insincere in a way. For some reason. I never thought of Green Day as the epitome of songwriting (Dan from Augustana is the epitome of songwriting, for me), but I expected a little better than this. It's a rather generic pop-type song.
I may possibly listen to other songs from that album, but probably not the whole album. Maybe there's another single from it, I don't know. If any new opinions about this song pop into my head, I might add them here but I can't guarantee that new opinions about this song will come to me.
As an afterthought, I decided to attempt a bit of an analysis of this song. I have taken some of the similes and other important phrases in the song and looked at what I associate with them. Some of the things are paraphrased from how they are in the song. These are just some very roughly thought out ideas, straight from brain to screen (rather than paper) so they may not be the most coherent but I haven't bothered to clean them up into a clearer form.
child looking at horizon - hope, naivete, wonder, innocence
ambulance with sirens - sense of urgency
son without father - lost, identity crisis (sort of), loneliness?
struggling mother - desperation
addict getting clean - hope but also the possibility of failure, a difficult task
gambler losing the last of their money - also desperation
soldier coming home for first time / dodged bullet and walked across landmine - brush with death, relief, emotional attachments to people (family/etc)
find home for restless - not finding a place to belong
bleeding from the storm? - chaos, have I survived it unscathed?
above the rain and roses - ?? rain -> sadness; roses: thorns? Things that are beautiful but also have a more unpleasant side?
shine a light into the wreckage -
are you scared to death to live?
The count: (like in that one post I did about eyeballs and eyelashes)
times I made positive/glowing remarks about Dan/Augustana (even though this post is supposed to be about a Green Day song): 3
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Movie review: Born on the 4th of July
In any case, this movie that I just watched has Tom Cruise in it. I have no particular strong opinions towards Tom Cruise but I think I like him a bit more than George Clooney and even Brad Pitt. The movie was based on events that happened to a real person, and apparently said person wrote a book so I think I may have to try and read that sometime. Incidentally, Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now were also based on books (The Short Timers and Heart of Darkness, respectively, both of which I have read). The plot is about a young man who joins the Marines (which were also featured in FMJ, however this movie did not have the boot camp scenes like FMJ did. I saw a jelly doughnut the other day and thought about FMJ) to go fight in the Vietnam War. Initially, he is enthusiastic about serving his country as he had always dreamed of doing such since he was a young boy. However, in Vietnam he ends up accidentally killing a number of helpless civilians as well as a fellow soldier (also accidentally). In short order he gets shot through the back (in the scene, you can see a huge bloody hole in his back) which leaves him paralyzed. He returns to the US and spends time in a veteran's hospital which is decidedly unpleasant. These events eventually cause him to become disillusioned about the war and become an anti-war activist.
Similarities and differences:
This movie took a different approach than FMJ; in FMJ the main character(s) - Joker and Private Pyle who meets an unfortunate end at his own hands - are kind of just thrown into the whole war thing - they are more passive than Tom Cruise's character in Born on the 4th of July. FMJ also takes place entirely before and during the time that Joker goes to Vietnam; it ends with a scene of him still in Vietnam reflecting on the events that have happened since the beginning of the movie. It's sort of an interesting final scene, very stark; as I remember it, they are marching through somewhere with flames in the background, it's dark and they're chanting ironically a children's song. Joker says that he is "no longer afraid." Reflecting on FMJ, I begin to wonder what happened to Joker after the end of the movie. I don't remember if the book went on to describe events after what were shown in the movie. For some reason, I feel like what happens to him is that he eventually gets killed in Vietnam.
The movie reminded me a bit of the scenes in Forrest Gump where Forrest fights in the Vietnam War as well as what happens after that, in that he (Forrest) has a lady friend (Jenny) who is a hippie and involved in anti-war protests. A similar thing is seen in Born on the 4th of July - Tom Cruise's character has a lady friend who is also a hippie and an anti-war protester. However, Forrest Gump has a much lighter tone than Born on the 4th of July.
In FMJ, there is a scene where Joker is in a helicopter and watching another soldier shoot at civilians on the ground. Joker asks of him "How can you shoot women and children?" In Born on the 4th of July, there's kind of a similar scene in that civilians get killed but it's different than the one in FMJ.
Incidentally I feel like I should mention that there was a lot of profanity in this movie. I wasn't particularly bothered, but there was a lot. So maybe don't watch this movie around other people if they would be bothered by the profanity.
In any case, I was quite surprised that this war movie was NOT weird. Perhaps that was because it didn't take place entirely in the war zone, like the other ones I've seen. It also made me wonder if there are such things as pro war movies, seeing as this one and FMJ can be considered anti-war movies. Tom Cruise did a good job of acting in this movie, I think. I would be inclined to watch other movies that he's been in, perhaps.
Further reading:
Here is an interesting article that offers some additional relevant commentary on Born on the 4th of July; mainly (tl;dr here) that it is prescient and still relevant to today's society; unlike other Vietnam War movies like FMJ and Apocalypse Now that are more bound to the times they were made in.
Here is an article with some trivia about the movie.
Sunday, October 30, 2016
Ponderings about a Law and Order DVD
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
War movies
Last weekend I was awake sort of early so I went downstairs and looked to see what was on television. I looked through the channel guide and it turned out that on some channel there was a movie about the Vietnam War that I had not seen. Mind you, I have only seen two aside from that one that I only managed to catch the last half hour of. Unsurprisingly, this last half hour part was weird. This movie was called The Deer Hunter and it was from the 70s. I had to go look up what had happened in the earlier parts of the movie since only seeing the last half hour didn't make much sense. The movie had a number of scenes with Russian roulette which was... different. It also contributed to me thinking that it was a strange movie. If someone can show me a movie about the Vietnam War that I don't think is weird, they deserve a prize. Full Metal Jacket was weird. Apocalypse Now was even weirder and it didn't even have the virtue of having (a fat and unsightly) Vincent D'Onofrio in it. Neither did The Deer Hunter for that matter. This may be a futile effort, but I would give the movie Saving Private Ryan a chance even though it is also a war movie. But maybe it isn't weird. I wouldn't know because I haven't watched it yet. It has Tom Hanks in it.
I decided that I wouldn't watch anymore war movies after I wasted 3 hours watching Apocalypse Now, but it seems that I did not keep that resolution. At least this time it was only a half hour of my time that I spent watching part of a war movie. If/when I watch Saving Private Ryan or perhaps some other war movie, I will be sure to post a review of it.